LOS  PADRES  FORESTWATCH

PROTECTING OUR PUBLIC LANDSALONG CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST

home about us

our region

current projects join or donate take action!  

June 1, 2006

FORESTWATCH, RURAL LANDOWNERS FORMALLY CHALLENGE BLM'S
OIL DRILLING AUCTION

Landowners Weren’t Notified of the Federal Government’s Plans to Sell Mineral Rights to Oil Companies on 19,780 Acres

 

 

THE CUYAMA VALLEY – An alliance of rural landowners this week joined ForestWatch in filing a series of challenges to an upcoming oil lease sale of nearly 20,000 acres. The lease sale is the first step towards allowing oil exploration and development in this remote area flanked by the Los Padres National Forest, the Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge, and the Carrizo Plain National Monument.

 

The federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announced the lease sale last month, and scheduled the auction for June 14. During the sale, the BLM will auction off the mineral rights on thirty-two parcels in Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Kern, Ventura, and Kings counties. The winning bidder receives the right to drill for oil, and bidding starts at only $2.00 per acre.

 

This week, eight landowners and ForestWatch formally filed challenges to the lease sale, demanding that the BLM remove the most controversial lands from the auction block.

 

This parcel on the Rangeview Ranch is slated for auction. It overlooks the Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge and the unique geologic formations in Ballinger Canyon in the Los Padres National Forest.

 

“We were shocked to learn that the government could sell an oil lease on our land without even notifying us,” said Penny Maines, who with her husband Knute Johnson owns 60 acres of land along the boundary of the Los Padres National Forest and the Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge in Kern County, listed as Parcel 6-06-24 in the upcoming lease sale. “We purchased this property because of its unspoiled natural beauty. The prospect of oil rigs, pipelines and roads tearing up the landscape is devastating.”

 

Very few of the lands targeted for leasing are actually owned by the federal government. Eighty-five percent of the lands are privately-owned, with the federal government holding title only to the underground mineral rights.

 

Leasing split-estate lands has become very controversial in other parts of the country like Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah, where a similar expansion of oil and gas drilling in remote areas is underway. This controversy stems from the fact that the BLM does not send notice of the lease sale to landowners, allowing oil companies to bid on split-estate leases without the consent – or even the knowledge of – the surface landowner. The winning bidder commonly holds the right to conduct geophysical exploration and seismic tests, to construct roads to drill sites, to take water, to dispose of wastewater, to install tanks and pipelines, and to otherwise enter the private land for oil drilling.

 

An existing oil facility in the lower Cuyama Valley. The June lease sale could encourage the expansion of this development into the quiet, pristine, and ecologically fragile upper valley.

 

The BLM tried to auction many of these same parcels last year, but failed to properly notify the public about how to formally challenge the lease sale. The agency also forgot to conduct an environmental analysis to avoid environmental damage caused by oil drilling. After ForestWatch filed a formal protest, the agency cancelled the sale.

 

Now, the oil industry hopes to bid on these lands in June. This time, the BLM prepared an Environmental Assessment, but it does not satisfy strict requirements designed to protect wildlife, clean air and water, prime farmlands, and floodplains from oil damage. The BLM also failed to notify ForestWatch, the affected landowners, or other expert agencies, of the availability of the study and how to submit comments to the agency. In a document sent to ForestWatch, the BLM admitted that it went to great lengths to notify the oil and gas industry.

 

“Once again, the oil industry receives special treatment at the expense of public participation and environmental protection,” said a spokesman for ForestWatch. “The BLM has no respect for rural landowners or the environment.”

 

Most of the parcels slated for leasing are undeveloped, and many are under active cultivation by farmers. Others are situated right along the boundaries of protected lands like the Bitter Creek Wildlife Refuge, the Los Padres National Forest, and the Carrizo Plain National Monument. Allowing a network of oil rigs, pipelines, and transmission wires will significantly change the rural landscape of this area. In addition, each of the parcels provides habitat for several threatened and endangered plants and animals, including the San Joaquin kit fox, the California condor, the California jewelflower, and the blunt-nosed leopard lizard, according to the agency.

 

 

The Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge is a 14,094-acre sanctuary set aside in 1985 to protect feeding and roosting habitat for the California condor, one of the world’s most endangered birds. Located in San Luis Obispo, Kern, and Ventura counties, this refuge is the site where the last female condor was captured in 1986 for the captive breeding program. The refuge is off-limits to the public, but the BLM is proposing to lease two parcels totaling 2,160 acres along the refuge boundary.

 

“One of the reasons we bought the property is because of the protection offered by the wildlife refuge,” said Charles Fox, a Kern County resident who owns 80 acres near the refuge listed as Parcel 6-06-24 in the upcoming lease sale. “It’s very peaceful country out there. We don’t need oil wells and we certainly don’t want them on our property.”

 

A small residence on the Rangeview Ranch. The BLM failed to notify this property owner, and dozens of others, about the upcoming lease sale, even though their land could be directly affected by oil drilling.

 

The Carrizo Plain National Monument in San Luis Obispo County was set aside by Presidential Proclamation in 2001 to protect one the largest remaining untouched ecosystem in the southern San Joaquin Valley. It contains one of the highest concentrations of threatened and endangered plants and animals in the state. The BLM is proposing to lease four parcels totaling over 1,800 acres along the monument boundary.

 

The Cuyama Valley is one of region’s most rural areas, and federal biologists have designated the upper reaches of the valley as an “Area of High Ecological Significance” because of the abundance of rare plants and animals. The area also serves as a gateway to the Los Padres National Forest and the Dick Smith Wilderness Area. Six parcels totaling nearly 7,300 acres are slated for auction here. These parcels are located along or within a half-mile of the forest boundary, and also within the viewshed of California Scenic Highway 33. Some of them are within the floodplain of the Cuyama River.

 

An agricultural field is nestled between the Cuyama River and the Los Padres National Forest.

 

What's Next

 

The land auction is scheduled for June 14 in Sacramento, a five-hour drive from the lands on the auction block. Every lease sale since 1999 has been held in Bakersfield near the lands to be auctioned. This time, officials have selected the Sacramento location, making it very inconvenient for local landowners and other concerned citizens to attend.

 

The BLM has 60 days to issue its decisions on the protests. If the BLM agrees with the protests, officials could remove the most controversial parcels from the lease sale.

 

 

 

 

 

MORE INFO

ForestWatch
Protest Letter

460Kb pdf file

 

Lease Sale Notice
Amendment 1
Amendment 2

Parcel Map

Final Environmental Assessment

Record of Decision

 

Directions to the
Oil Auction


All material copyright © 2004-2009 Los Padres ForestWatch, Inc.